A machine that churns out three-dimensional artificial tumours could help improve anti-cancer drug testing, researchers say. The "tumour factory" offers a better alternative to the flat cultured cells currently used to test new anticancer drugs.
"Cells grown in a monolayer are very useful in many studies," says Maria Teresa Santini of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità in Rome, Italy, who was not involved with the work . "But they cannot represent a three-dimensional tumour."
In a real cancer, different parts of a tumour are fed different amounts of oxygen. Cells growing in a flat monolayer all receive the same amounts of oxygen are all exposed to an equal quantities of nutrients. "Testing anticancer drugs on these models may be very inaccurate," Teresa says.
Small clumps of cells known as 3D tumour spheroids provide a better model. But, until now, spheroids have had to be made one at a time in a process that produces different sizes each time.
Luke Lee's group at the University of California in Berkeley, US, has developed a technique to quickly generate spheroids of a standard size at low cost. The breast cancer drug Taxol has already been shown half as effective on spheroids as it is on 2D cell cultures.
Breaking the mould
At the heart of the Berkeley team's device is an array of U-shaped traps each 35 micrometers across and 50 micrometers deep, which are made from polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), a silicon-based organic polymer.
The array is held inside a chamber through which flows breast cancer cells suspended in growth solution. Cells that flow into the microscopic traps cannot flow out again, although the growth solution can escape from a small gap underneath the trap too large for a cell.
Over the course of a few hours, empty traps become filled with cells and, over about 7 hours, they attach to one another and form tumour spheroids containing 9-11 cells inside each trap. Solution constantly supplies the outer layer of the spheroids with fresh nutrients and oxygen, and removes waste excretions. The PDMS polymer also allows oxygen to reach the cells.
"The continuous flow in our device plays an important role in spheroid formation since it helps maintain the cells in a compact group," says Lee. "The cells have more chance to contact each other and adhere."
Mass production
Santini is impressed by Lee's study. "This represents an important development," she told New Scientist. "It's been difficult forming spheroids of the same characteristics before - having same size spheroids makes the tumour response to a particular concentration [of drug] more statistically relevant, since it can be repeated without error due to cell number."
But Wolfgang Mueller Klieser of Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz, Germany, is not convinced that growing uniform spheroids is necessary because collections of mismatched ones can quickly be sorted by size. "But, one great advantage here is that they can produce spheroids relatively rapidly - the standard methods take 10 days to produce spheroids 0.5 mm across."
Lee's spheroids are ten times smaller than that, points out Helene Bobichon of the University of Reims, France. "Making spheroids with a too low a number of cells could be inefficient for getting similar results to an "in vivo" response," she says.
Lee says small spheroids accurately represent tumours at an earlier stage of development, and has plans to make larger ones using new prototypes of the device. "We focused on small spheroids for the proof of concept," he says,
Journal reference: Biomedical Microdevices (DOI: 10.1007/s10544-007-9125-8
If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.
Have your say
Root Of Problem
Tue Mar 18 12:12:38 GMT 2008 by Mike
They appear to be focussing on studying cancer cells rather than how and why they are generated and how to switch off production of these cells.
Why?
Root Of Problem
Tue Mar 18 12:25:49 GMT 2008 by Steve
Because if you want to test drugs you will want to test them on this kind of thing initially, instead of testing everything directly in humans or even mice. It allows for the rapid testing of lots of compounds, making drug discovery more efficient en reliable. In this way only the best candidate drugs get to humans.
Another reason to grow cancer cells is "know thy enemy". You have to study something before you can efficiently kill it.
Hope this clears it up Mike.
Very nice idea btw.
Root Of Problem
Fri Mar 21 09:07:29 GMT 2008 by Tom Mitchell
One gets the idea that they will be able to ultimately cure one artificial cancer tumour with great ease. Mean while the naturally occurring tumours will just be busily spreading away.
I wonder where the research is for pre-cancer conditions as in finding preventatives.
In order to create an artificial tumour wouldn't one have passed through precancerous conditions?
Do we sniff money-making rather than disease prevention?
All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.
If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.




