Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Reproductive Justice and Gender

The Real Pro-Life Candidate

By Cristina Page, RH Reality Check. Posted June 25, 2008.


It's pro-choice policies that result in dramatic declines in the need for abortion, and it's the pro-choice candidates who truly value life.
Advertisement

Obama has a huge opportunity to win over an unlikely voting bloc: Pro-life voters. The debate over reproductive rights has for decades existed in the abstract; it's been a back and forth volley over "values" that's heavy on emotion and light on fact. But the facts reveal surprising truths and they ought to be hammered home by Obama. The data show that the pro-choice approach is more effective at achieving what the American public views as "pro-life" goals -- i.e. reducing the number of abortions, preventing late term abortion -- than the so-called "pro-life" approach.

McCain may campaign on the "immorality" of abortion but the policies he supports seem to lead to lots more of them. Isn't it time to turn the tables? Obama should hold McCain and and other anti-choice leaders accountable for their failure to find solutions to the high rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion. He has the opportunity to change the debate. It's not about abortion; it's about preventing unwanted pregnancy.

And it is the pro-choice movement that is finding effective ways to do that. This is the unacknowledged fact that should be broadcast loud and clear during this election campaign. Here's the message: It's pro-choice policies that result in dramatic declines in the need for abortion. That's a truth both pro-choice and pro-life voters would be interested to know.

The pro-choice movement, and pro-choice politicians, alone champion wider access to birth control, and birth control is the only proven way to reduce unintended pregnancy and abortion. Obama shouldn't get sucked into the silly debate about whether the Pill is an abortifacient since even the anti-abortion movement's most respected physicians agree there's no scientific evidence that it is. He should ask why McCain hasn't championed campaigns to reduce unwanted pregnancies. The electorate should be reminded that it's the pro-choice movement and pro-choice elected officials that have fought for health insurance coverage for contraception as well as to bring new and more effective contraceptives to market. (Emergency contraception, for instance.) Also, let's not forget that the birth control pill itself is available to Americans entirely because of the efforts of the pro-choice movement.

Check out any NARAL affiliate's agenda and you'll see that most pro-choice work is devoted to increasing access to prevention. Up until Bush ordered it removed, the Centers for Disease Control's website had a "Programs that Work" area for sex education programs that quantitative data showed resulted in reductions in the teem pregnancy and STD rates. Every program was comprehensive sex-ed, the kind promoted by the pro-choice movement. Not one was abstinence-only, the program that preaches that teens simply shouldn't have sex, which "pro-life" forces favor. Obama supports the comprehensive sex-ed programs that have been proven to work, McCain supports no-sex-until-marriage programs which have been proven to fail.

Obama could remind the voter that only 11% of sexually active women don't use contraception and from this 11% comes 50% of the nation's abortions. Ninety-one percent of the American public strongly favors contraception because of this very reason. Very few voters are aware, however, that not one pro-life organization in the United States supports contraception. Or that instead, pro-life groups have been spearheading campaigns to prevent Americans from accessing birth control. No less than 80% of self-described pro-life voters strongly support contraception. Few know that McCain has a long legislative resume devoted to voting against access to contraception and prevention.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: elections, anti-choice, abortion, pro-life, pro-choice, contraception, birth control, reproductive justice

Cristina Page is the author of 'How the Pro-Choice Movement Saved America' (Perseus Books, 2006).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
evidence, please
Posted by: pfeifer999 on Jun 25, 2008 7:42 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Study after study suggests the right to life approach, which McCain has helped execute for decades, is actually the root of the problem: leading to more abortions and later ones too."

It shouldn't be too hard to offer some citations, since there have been so many studies. And do these studies merely "suggest" or are they conclusive?

The other side can refer to "study after study" that shows that providing "comprehensive sex education" and free contraceptives to teens increases abortion rates.

There's not going to be any progress on this issue when both sides continue to bullshit each other.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: evidence, please Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: evidence, please Posted by: pfeifer999
» RE: evidence, please Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: evidence, please Posted by: pfeifer999
wrensis
Posted by: wrensis on Jun 25, 2008 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First he would actually have to do something more than say he supports choice.

His record on actually doing what he says is less encouraging.

Accepting Public Funding

Refusal to being photographed with a Gay mayor who had fundraisers for him

Will he stand up and be counted on the immunity being taken out of the FISA bill, he has indicated he will not.

Small points but he needs to walk the talk.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» THIS is "justice"? Posted by: pfeifer999
Way too much government
Posted by: carbon-based on Jun 25, 2008 8:29 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I dont want the government in my kids pants!

Why is it that people look to the government to decide what is moral and not!. What happened to families raising their children with what THEY feel are acceptible values!

I dont want schools or Obama or McCain telling kids it's ok or not ok to have sex as a teenager if the parents are telling them something else.

Nor do I want the government telling me that it's ok or not ok to have an abortion. These are personal choices.

The government, pro life and pro choice groups need to stay out of telling America how to raise their children!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Way too much government Posted by: mr. joshua
» Mr. Joshua Posted by: pfeifer999
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
» sad that you have to sink.... Posted by: pfeifer999
» RE: sad that you have to sink.... Posted by: WyrdSister
» no, you're right Posted by: pfeifer999
» RE: no, you're right Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: no, you're right Posted by: pfeifer999
» RE: morality and the government Posted by: WyrdSister
» please, save us all WyrdSister Posted by: pfeifer999
» Wyrdsister Posted by: pfeifer999
» RE: Wyrdsister Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Wyrdsister Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Wyrdsister Posted by: pfeifer999