Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Water

Coke and Pepsi's New Marketing Strategy: Pull at Your Heart Strings

By Richard Girard, Polaris Institute. Posted March 14, 2008.


The big bottled water companies are trying to counter negative press by tying their products to charitable causes.
Advertisement

World Water Day 2008 (March 22) will see a flurry of announcements from bottled water companies who claim to be helping solve the globe's water crisis. The catch is that these altruistic claims are intimately tied to major advertising campaigns designed to convince the public to buy their products.

Numerous media and industry reports are saying that sales of bottled water are slowing as a result of campaigns targeting the product's environmental and social impact. In a recent article, Brandweek declared that Pepsi and Coke are facing "evaporating sales growth for bottled water and increased concerns about their products' impact on the environment."

Another report, from industry publication Beverage Digest, said that sales and growth of the bottled water industry in 2007 was about half of what it was in 2006. Recently reported annual results from the world's largest bottled water company Nestlé show a slowdown in growth in its bottled water sector from 2006. According to the Beverage Marketing Corporation, global sales growth has consistently dropped since 2003.

The slowdown in growth of bottled water sales combined with industry reports and widespread media attention on the negative impacts of bottled water highlight how the global anti-bottled water campaign is having a major impact.

While campaigners may raise a crystal glass (of tap water) to this news, it is important to keep in mind that the industry is not rolling over and going away. People are still buying huge amounts of the stuff and the corporations will be trying their best to keep existing customers and attract new markets in new regions. The question is how will bottled water companies continue to convince people to buy its products.

How will the BW giants fight the backlash?

Marketing trade publication Brandweek predicts that Coke and Pepsi will fight the growing backlash against bottled water with intense 'ethical' or 'responsible' marketing, understood as tying the purchase of a product to charitable activities. A number of ad campaigns for bottled water already include charitable ties. According to Brandweek, the use of A-list celebrity endorsements of these types of campaigns is likely to increase.

PepsiCo has already started down this path through its relationship with Matt Damon. Earlier this year PepsiCo donated $2.5 million to Damon's H20 Africa clean water initiative. To compliment Pepsi's donation, the movie star is endorsing Ethos bottled water (Starbucks' bottled water brand), which will be launched nationally this spring through PepsiCo and Starbucks' North American Coffee Partnership joint venture.

The Ethos brand is promoted by claiming to donate 5 cents from every bottle sold to help children around the world gain access to clean water. Part of a slogan from the brand's upcoming North American ad campaign states "if you choose to drink bottled water, please choose to make a difference." Until now Ethos water has only been available at Starbucks' 7,000 North American outlets. This will soon change when PepsiCo's huge national distribution system moves the brand out to 40,000 merchandisers in North America.

Not to be outdone, according to Brandweek, Coca-Cola North America is getting ready to launch its own 'socially responsible' water brand. There is speculation that the company will enlist a movie star to co-brand the new beverage. Coke already uses celebrities to shill its various brands, and it is only matter of time until a public figure endorser steps up to push Coke's green message.

Coke is no stranger to this type of marketing and has recently been in hot water for pushing one of its water brands by convincing people that its product will help reforest Australia. In a recent ad campaign for its Mt. Franklin water brand, customers are encouraged to 'plant a tree' by registering the bottle's barcode on the company's website. Once registered, the company along with its partner Landcare Australia will plant a tree in the registrant's name.

Under the arrangement Coca Cola Amatil (30 percent owned by The Coca-Cola Company) will pay one of Australia's biggest environmental groups, Landcare, $150,000 to plant 250,000 trees. In return, Coca Cola Amatil places the well known Landcare logo on every bottle of Mt. Franklin Water. One Landcare employee who spoke out against the partnership said that the logo is being used "by a corporate giant who is only interested in greenwashing public opinion and tricking people living in the city into thinking they are doing the correct thing by the environment by purchasing their product."

Selling green to make green

Which ever way you look at it, this technique known in the marketing world as 'responsible' or 'ethical' marketing, is just that, marketing. In other words, it is a means to convince people to buy a product, thus, ensuring higher profits with a bonus to the company of greenwashing social and environmental impacts. This tactic is a clever trick because it lends brands a social image and injects a charitable dimension into consumer spending.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: water, bottled water, coke, water privatization, nestle, pepsi, greenwashing

Richard Girard is the corporate researcher at the Polaris Institute.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
it's always surprised me to see someone bypass a water fountain to buy a bottle of water
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Mar 14, 2008 12:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'mericans: the bulb dims; no child left behind!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm a victim
Posted by: rickiey on Mar 16, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's true. These evil beverage companies have got me addicted. I'm surprised they haven't doubled or tripled their prices, because I'm afraid I would pay it.

I will drink my flavored water, until they make it illegal. And probably afterwards as well.

I'm not sure why everyone is paying for "plain" though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We are in a recession...
Posted by: colinmeister on Mar 19, 2008 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And money, for most people, is in short supply. Bottled water is an unnecessary expense - why pay for something which you can get free? Bottled water is probably a passing phase.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A note on bottled water
Posted by: zipper696 on Mar 19, 2008 4:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those, like me that live in a hurricane area and like to have an "emergency stash" of provisions, bear in mind that bottled water has only a six month shelf life, so use it to water the garden every few months and replace with fresh.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't forget that those plastic bottles require LOADS of petroleum to just to manufacture !
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 19, 2008 5:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks to Big Oil and Chemical, you're being conned. Don't worry though. As crude oil continues to rise in price to the point of being prohibitively expensive, it might be enough to get more people to get their butts off the couch and turn to nature one more time. Hey, our ancestors lived rather well without all this artificial bullshit and there's no reason we can't do the same.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why the focus on bottled water?
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on Mar 19, 2008 7:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a brother who is a plant manager for one of "the big 4" so I'll get that out of the way right now. I've talked about this sort of thing with him on many occasions.

With that being said I never have been a bottled water consumer except on rare occasion but I do not understand why Alternet and other left-leaning media put so much focus on this particular segment of the beverage industry while virtually ignoring other water issues that are of much greater significance.

People buy packaged beverages. A huge chunk of bottled water's growth has been stolen from soda. I would consider that a good thing from a public health perspective. The issue of recycling certainly needs to be addressed but it should be done with recycling programs that target all plastic packaging (think detergent bottles, windex,etc).

It also takes (don't quote me on this) about 1.3 gallons of water to manufacture a gallon of bottled water. That is VERY efficient when looking at it from the perspective of packaged beverages. Here are some others by comparison:

It takes 100,000 gallons of water to manufacture one automobile.
A cow must drink 4 gallons of water to make 1 gallon of milk.
It takes 30 -40 gallons of water to fill a bathtub.
It takes 50 glasses of water to grow enough oranges to make one glass of orange juice.
It takes 10 - 15 gallons of water to wash dishes by hand.
Ten inches of melted snow equals about one inch of water.
122 gallons of water are needed to produce one loaf of bread.
It takes 2,500 gallons of water to produce one pound of beef.
You can live about one month without food; but only a few days without water.
A 5 minutes shower uses 25 - 50 gallons of water.
Brushing your teeth for 2 minutes while running water takes 6 gallons.
9 to 12 gallons of water are used in a dishwasher.
It takes 6 gallons of water to produce one serving of french fries.
It takes 10 gallons of water to make one serving of a soda.
About 3/4 of the human body is water.
Growing a day's food for 1 adult takes about 1,700 gallons of water.
A typical household uses about 100 gallons of water per day per person.
You can drink more than 4,000 glasses of tap water for the same cost as a 6-pack of soda.
Families turn on water faucets about 70 times a day
Washing a load of clothes uses about 50 gallons of water.
About 9 gallons of water are used to process one can of fruit.
Making a hamburger, fries, and soda uses 1500 gallons of water.(raise potatoes, grain, cattle)
Over 42,000 gallons of water are needed to grow and prepare the food for a typical Thanksgiving dinner for eight. This is enough water to fill a 30' by 50' swimming pool.
2/3 of the water you use at home you use in the bathroom.
Watermelon is 93% water.
Tomatoes are 90% Water.
Potatoes are 80% water.
Ear of corn is 70% water.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» awesome stats!! Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: awesome stats!! Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: awesome stats!! Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: awesome stats!! Posted by: suprmark
» RE: awesome stats!! Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: Why the focus on bottled water? Posted by: lensman_z9m9z
Easy Alternatives (a note from your concerned utility worker)
Posted by: stellabloo on Mar 19, 2008 8:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rich people will buy anything. Bottled water from France. Water "purifiers" that vortex and ionize to simulate a mountain stream.
Most countries require that the water coming from your tap be safe if not exactly delicious. Water treatment is not rocket science; only a few processes are used and yes, you can duplicate them at home.
The most efficient way of removing chlorine, chlorination by-products and trace volatile organic compounds (residual pesticides, etc.) is activated carbon, as in an ordinary Brita-type pitcher. Companies like Hazco treat the worst type of industrial waste with activated carbon.
If your water is dirty, excessively chlorinated or very hard, an in-line treatment system such as Pur is recommended, with a simple sedimentation filter and a separate activated carbon cartridge.
If you have a particularly bad well with H2S bacteria or suspected contamination, then supplement with an additional RO cartridge; reverse osmosis is the most advanced treatment, as used to prepare lab water.
Distillation is generally a waste of energy, unless you are in fact preparing lab water in small quantities.
Remember to change cartridges and filters regularly as they can be a breeding ground for bacteria.

Bottoms up! ;)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Justin
Posted by: loxias on Mar 19, 2008 11:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So many misconceptions and mis-perceptions. Of everything. Myself included. So easy to mislead as well. Every bottled drink is mostly water. People buy bottled water because of municipal supply scares, fluorine scares, bacteria fears, prescription drug residue fears, heavy metal fears, and of course the fact that it's a product in a consumerist society, ergo it will be bought. Aren't most big 4 bottled water brands municipal sources? It's bottled tap water so not much difference. I tend toward spring water or Brita filtered tap. I'm sure I have no reason to drink either and every reason to drink both. I occasionally drink other bottled drinks, or drinks from public places, all of which contain indiscriminate water sources, don't fool yourself. I imagine in 10-20 years as things heat up and supplies shrink and become more contaminated, this will be a bigger issue. I would think that combating factory waste would be a bigger issue. No one batted an eye when Bush just devastated EPA precedents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BOTTLED
Posted by: rsmohio on Mar 19, 2008 2:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Above is a word that jumps out in this argument. The statistics given are enlightening and I don't question them. For me the issue is not the water, that will be used. The non-biodegradeable, long-life bottle is the problem. The problem exists for all items packed in individual bottles of plastic and glass. If there was a national push for recycling that could actually make a difference, then this problem could be mitigated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How much water is wasted in the manufacturing process for Coke and Pepsi?
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Mar 19, 2008 8:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How much water is wasted in the manufacturing, transportation, and disposal process for Coke and Pepsi?
If these companies really gave a rats ass, they would discontinue producing these poisonous ARTIFICIAL NEEDS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about the bottles?
Posted by: modeler on Mar 20, 2008 1:38 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some of them are not even safe from poisons in the "environmentally friendly" way they are made. And people complain about high gas prices, bottled water in a majority of cases is even more expensive while the production of the bottles is just as polluting as the exhaust from your gas guzzling Hummer. Go figure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tylenol is MADE WITH LOVE!!
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Mar 23, 2008 11:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cola? Harmless decadence? ah, not exactly...

who makes this shit? why, the same engineering schools that bring you BigTobacco research, FrankenFood (you know, like petroleum-based, NON-DAIRY 'creamer'), & strange products that are made JUST BECAUSE WE CAN, rather than after ETHICAL EVALUATION...
- international, municipal WATER vs commodified privatized water...
- GMO foods
- or just the dudes who make bizarre ad campaigns to promote dubious products, or products that would *feel* more reliable, if they had a longer research arc before 'moving to market'...
"Tylenol is Made with Love"

The Cola Conquest: remember WHAT INDUSTRY comes out of SUGARLAND... & who their representative was...

"oh we're winning the War on Drugs!!!"
...gotta make sure them BROWN FOLKS don't *communicate diseases* to us GOOD Khristian WHITE FOLKS, or... *gasp* use unapproved DRUGS...

New Coca-Cola Water Deal Omits India...

Consumption, corruption & World Water Day March 22

"Islands at Risk" - GMO & FrankenFood in Hawai'i

~~~
Spread Love...

BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian com
~~~
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]