Grammy winning record producer says CD quality isn't good enough

Producer T Bone Burnett talked passionately about sound quality, or lack thereof on a radio program, Soundcheck, from WNYC on Monday. Burnett produced Robert Plant and Allison Krauss' awesome Raising Sand CD; the O Brother, Where Art Thou soundtrack; as well as records by Bob Dylan, Los Lobos, Elvis Costello, and Counting Crows.
Turns out Burnett's no fan of CDs or downloads, stating that CD's inadequate sampling rate loses too much of the sound he heard while making and mixing records. He put it this way, "We've been fighting digital sound since it came out twenty years ago...music's gotten to a place that's harder to listen to."
Wow, the guy sounds like an audiophile to me, and he goes on about the degradation of sound from what he heard in the studio, "It's stepped down from tape to digital to compressed digital, so people are now listening to a Xerox of a Polaroid of a photograph of a painting." Tell it brother, but it's interesting Burnett never brought up vinyl or analog, though he did mention that it's only in the last few years that digital's gotten really good. I agree.
Digital losses have all taken their toll on the way people relate to music, so it's mostly background to other activities instead of the primary focus. Digitized sound is diluted to the point is ceases to connect with people on a visceral level. It's just there, a ghostly shadow of its original intent.
To fix the problem Burnett wants his future projects, like the new John Mellencamp album he produced that's due in July, to come out on DVD-Audio, with a bevy of formats including 24 bit/96 kHz WAV files, uncompressed 16bit/44.1kHz files, AAC, and MP3, so you can pick the level of fidelity that works for you. Burnett claims you'll finally get to hear the music as he intended when he made the record in the first place. "It's all part of what makes music feel good."
You can listen to the complete T-Bone Burnett interview here.
Steve Guttenberg is a frequent contributor to magazines and Web sites including Home Entertainment, Playback, and Ultimate AV. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
- Bookmark:
- Digg
- Del.icio.us





"Digital" is just the transport module, and it is excellent, fast, and lower overhead. Just give us the quality we want.
Especially in ear phones and headphones. Some on borderline high fidelity. Even home audio has taken a back seat to more media features and inputs. I will have to say though that I have heard a lot of crap coming from some recording studio's too. Some say they are being forced to keep modulation constant and prevent the low modulations. Loudness sells I guess.
Unfortunately digital was supposed to be better, but mostly it has been used to easily tweak the audio to take up less space on the media its on.
Problem is the greedy industry is still trying to make money off of those old shiny, plastic CDs.
So in the last year I've found myself in something of a quandary. If I buy vinyl I get great quality when listening to my home stereo but I'm not really physically set up to rip vinyl not to mention that the software for doing so is less convenient and less sophisticated that its CD counterpart. So at the moment I find myself asking, "Will I listen to this album more at home or elsewhere?" In other words, it sure would be nice if the labels provided the means for vinyl buyers to get easy access to the digital format too without having to pay full price for another "license to listen to the music" which I've already paid for.
There is a slight difference between the final analog master and the mp3. But nothing to really complain about, given the connivence of mp3's.
I come from a time of LP's and cassettes. Now that's a difference to complain about. Pops. Clicks. Hiss. Dolby. Uuuggg! I don't even want to remember those days! According to some of the posts here, some of you even miss those days! Now that's just plain silly.
Unless you're an extreme audiophile, and I mean extreme, and you have a sound system and listening room that has the best of the best (I'm talking hundreds of thousands invested in equipment and room design), don't worry about this issue. Enjoy the times everyone! Mp3's or AAC or whatever, are an awesome way to enjoy music!
Doesnt mean you're all correct. It only means you agree on the same thing. But, that 'thing' is still a sampled down garbage reproduction some times over.
Regarding the pops, clicks, hiss...... THOSE were the days. These days is garbage content and garbage quality. Guess its tough to distinguish garbage when its wrapped in garbage anyway.
cyberjam: You don't need to carry a car battery around your neck to get better sound, you just need to buy something better than an iPod. I know you won't bee cool anymore and it won't feel all sexy in your hand, but it will sound much better. Look into archos or cowon.
You're looking for Kobe beef in a mcwhopper world :(
btw - I'm not disagreeing with any point you make, just expressing my growing feeling of futility.
-
by adlieb
June 11, 2008 2:38 PM PDT
- Why go to a DVD-Audio format? Hello, we have something new called lossless Master Audio. It's available in this nice new format called Blu-Ray, and its backwards compatible with an SACD formatted player, or for that matter, any CD player, with the 2.0 channel LPCM recording. Trondheimsolistene, an orchestra from Norway released "Divertimenti," the first Blu-Ray Audio cut which includes "2.0 LPCM, 5.1 LPCM, 5.1 DTS HD Master Audio, 5.1 Dolby True HD, and 5.1 Dolby Digital at 48KHz." Now if CD doesn't have the sampling rate you're looking for, there's truly an "audiophile" grade technology out there.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 33 Comments >>Check out the Blu-Ray release here.
http://www.switched.com/2008/05/30/first-blu-ray-record-released/